Concepts on leadership evolved with various
models and styles, and are continually evolving but the assumption that
leadership emanates from specific characteristics that certain individuals
possess and demonstrate has been the underlying theme as research on leadership
from earliest times indicates.
Charismatic leadership uses charm to gain
the admiration of their followers. But despite their charm and apparent
concern, the charismatic leader may be somewhat more concerned with themselves
than anyone else. Effective leaders understand that “emotion comes
first; then comes reason” – especially when you want to bring in “change”.
Influencers who master feelings create better impact than those who only play
on feelings. But both types will always outperform those who only focus on
facts. To get a message across, it is therefore important to understand how you
make people feel.
Individuals can and do emerge as leaders
across a variety of situations and tasks. It can be reiterated that many
leaders (e.g. Steve Jobs in the corporate organization context), may not have
started out as charismatic leaders but later attained not only that status but
became cult figures.
We must also remember that great leaders,
while focusing on systemic change and building culture, must also develop
successors – even who have not been identified as so-called “charismatic” or given
any other labels initially.
They are responsible for carrying the
legacy forward to sustain the change process. These successors (e.g. Tim
Cook after Steve Jobs in Apple and Jeffrey Immelt after Jack Welch in G.E.) continue
the “sustenance and growth process” through their own kind of leadership,
endeavouring to put their own stamp on the organizations they inherit by
reinforcing or innovating the initiatives.
Comments
Post a Comment